The Automotive Industry is characterized by
dynamic competition, constantly changing markets and demanding
customer requirements. As such, the wide range of products
and capital commitment mean that companies need to have a high
degree of adaptability, generally resulting in adaptable production
systems. The trend in procurement, production and logistics
has therefore tended toward developing more flexible supply
chains, particularly where companies have to deal with ever
more disruptions in their supply chains. Furthermore, the resulting
challenges for a company increase dramatically if it is part
of several supply chains at the same time.
Customer-supplier relationships
in the automotive industry often show relatively pronounced
planning
deviations in forecasting
and release orders, i.e. across all time horizons. Such planning
uncertainty and the need for various contingency plans mean
high costs and poor performance at different points for OEMs
and suppliers. These extra costs – which could be avoided
if plans remained on schedule – are known as "turbulence
costs".
The main reasons for demand fluctuations include:
- Market developments
- Complexity of the Supply Chain
- Technology, such as changes or quality problems
- Restrictions, such as strikes or legal requirements
The aim of the Forecast Accuracy Measurement recommendation
is to define an indicator for forecast reliability which can
help to derive an action plan to increase guarantee of supply,
and to support cost minimization in supply chains. This means:
More stable process chains, more reliable forecasts and release
orders, and less rescheduling and fewer additional costs by
optimizing forecast accuracy, flexibility and transparency.
Evaluating the forecast quality is key to success. Although
bilateral customer-supplier contracts include numerous definitions
of planning deviation ranges, there is no uniform basis on
which to evaluate indicators for forecast quality.
This recommendation therefore proposes the following goals:
- Development of a formula for system-supported
evaluation of forecast-quality indicators including stability
classification
- Recommendations on the use of these indicators
Access the recommendation
|