Odette has just released a best practice recommendation which
defines a standardised way of acknowledging the receipt of
despatch advice messages and the communication of any errors.
These errors can be technical (syntax) or business process
related (data errors, mismatch of delivery dates and/or quantities
etc.). The recommendation focuses on the automotive supply
chain and was necessary to meet the increasing requirements
for accuracy and speed of information flows and overall cost
reductions.
When a defective Despatch Advice message (DESADV) is received,
the sender must be notified of the error(s). There are many
different methods used today between trading partners to communicate
the error notification. Many of the most common methods (fax,
mail, telephone, portal alerts) can lead to problems such as:
- Information not reaching the correct
partner/responsible person.
- Lack of visibility when several different parties are involved
in the process (VAN/Interconnect/operating department/external
service provider/Third-party delivery).
- Odette members, therefore, decided to launch a project
to develop a more reliable and standardised method
of error
notification.
The main objectives of the project were to:
- Standardise the responses to
the Despatch Advice.
- Reduce the effort required by using
standardised EDI messages.
- Produce a highly automated error handling process which increases
the transparency of the logistics process.
- Increase process stability in the whole
supply chain.
In a despatch advice message,
the supplier transmits information on shipped parts or assemblies
and associated packages,
together with quantities, label numbers, serial numbers,
departure
time and estimated arrival time.
 |
The message is critical for the goods receiving process,
updating warehouse figures and detecting bottleneck situations.
Whenever the despatch advice cannot be processed automatically,
a manual intervention is necessary to avoid an expensive
disruption to production. Although the message has a key
role for the control of logistics processes, the handling
of errors is often rather poor. |
Various types of error can lead to a situation
where a despatch advice cannot be processed by the receiver’s
system. In the worst case, due to syntax errors, the message
cannot
be processed at all. Other errors can be related to
erroneous data (wrong identifier etc.) and finally there might
be discrepancies
between the transmitted figures and the actual received
(or usable) quantities.
In many cases, the sender of the message (usually the
supplier) incurs a financial penalty for each error
caused by an
erroneous message, to compensate for the additional
effort and disruption
at the customer end. Both sides have a genuine interest
to avoid these situations and to implement actions
that lead
to an improvement in the quality of the transmitted
data. A standardised
notification of errors that can be processed automatically
will undoubtedly help to achieve this improvement.
For the notification of detected errors and/or discrepancies,
specific message implementation guidelines were
developed by the project team to facilitate the use of
UN/EDIFACT
message types CONTRL, APERAK and RECADV. For the
RECADV, a profile
of the Joint Automotive Industry Forum (JAIF) Global
Receiving Advice recommendation has been used.
| In summary, the main drivers for the Despatch Advice
Response recommendation were a higher process transparency,
an increase in inventory accuracy, a reduction in time
spent on exception handling and a reduction in the financial
penalties which are a cause of resentment between suppliers
and customers (often due to lack of information regarding
the type of error involved). |
 |
We are convinced that this new recommendation
will lead to a better relationship and closer
integration of business partners
in the supply chain and to an increase in process stability.
It can also be used by software and service providers to
enhance the functionality of their solutions.
Access
Odette Publications
For more information contact the Odette Programme
Manager, Joerg
Walther
|